Objective: to create an animated infographic on the concept of Permanent Health Education according to the National Policy and its main differences compared to continuing education and health education. Method: a methodological study that analyzed context and knowledge gaps with a literature review and brainstorming; synthesized knowledge into a concept map; built and validated a script; created a didactic design; and produced infographic media. 18 representatives from the Center for Permanent Education and Humanization participated in the stages of context analysis and synthesis of knowledge, and six specialists participated in the validation of the script. Results: through the combination of texts, images, audios, animations and transitions, the concepts, principles and legal journey of the Permanent Education policy were presented with examples from daily work and, at the end, the difference compared to continuing education and health education is presented. The specialist on the theme evaluated the infographic positively as it has clear information that meet the needs of the target audience; favors learning; and is able to circulate in the scientific environment. Conclusion: the infographic includes content on Permanent Health Education as it represents the daily work scenario and encourages reflection by the health care workers.

Objetivo: desarrollar una infografía animada sobre el concepto de Educación Permanente en Salud de acuerdo con la Política Nacional y sus principales diferencias con respecto a la educación continua y a la educación en salud. Método: estudio metodológico que analizó el contexto y las brechas de conocimiento con revisión de la literatura y brainstorming, sintetizó el conocimiento en un mapa conceptual; creó y validó el guión; elaboró el diseño didáctico y produjo los medios infográficos. Participaron 18 interlocutores del Núcleo de Educación Permanente y Humanización en las etapas de análisis del contexto y síntesis de conocimientos y seis especialistas en la validación del guión. Resultados: mediante la asociación de textos, imágenes, audios, animaciones y transiciones, se presentaron los conceptos, los principios y trayectoria la jurídica de la política de Educación Permanente con ejemplos del trabajo cotidiano y, al final, se expone su diferencia en relación con la educación continua y la educación en salud. Los especialistas en la materia evaluaron positivamente la infografía por contener una información clara que satisface las necesidades del público objetivo: favoreciendo el aprendizaje y ser apta circular en el medio científico. Conclusión: la infografía contempla contenidos sobre la Educación Permanente en Salud al representar el escenario del trabajo diario; además, incentiva la reflexión de los trabajadores de la salud.

Objetivo: desenvolver infográfico animado sobre o conceito de Educação Permanente em Saúde de acordo com a Política Nacional e suas principais diferenças com relação à educação continuada e educação em saúde. Método: estudo metodológico por via de análise de contexto e lacunas de conhecimento com revisão de literatura e brainstorming; síntese de conhecimentos em mapa conceitual; construção e validação de roteiro; elaboração de desenho didático e produção da mídia infográfica. Participaram 18 interlocutores de Núcleo de Educação Permanente e Humanização nas etapas de análise do contexto e síntese do conhecimento e seis especialistas na validação do roteiro. Resultados: por meio de associação de textos, imagens, áudios, animações e transições, foram apresentados os conceitos, princípios e a trajetória legal da política de Educação Permanente, com exemplos do cotidiano do trabalho, destacando-se as diferenças com relação à educação continuada e educação em saúde. Os especialistas no tema avaliaram positivamente o infográfico por possuir informações claras, que atendem as necessidades do público-alvo; favorecer o aprendizado e estar apto para circular no meio científico. Conclusão: o infográfico contempla conteúdos sobre a Educação Permanente em Saúde ao representar o cenário do cotidiano do trabalho e incentiva a reflexão pelos trabalhadores da saúde.

Objetivo: desenvolver infográfico animado sobre o conceito de Educação Permanente em Saúde de acordo com a Política Nacional e suas principais diferenças com relação à educação continuada e educação em saúde. Método: estudo metodológico por via de análise de contexto e lacunas de conhecimento com revisão de literatura e brainstorming; síntese de conhecimentos em mapa conceitual; construção e validação de roteiro; elaboração de desenho didático e produção da mídia infográfica. Participaram 18 interlocutores de Núcleo de Educação Permanente e Humanização nas etapas de análise do contexto e síntese do conhecimento e seis especialistas na validação do roteiro. Resultados: por meio de associação de textos, imagens, áudios, animações e transições, foram apresentados os conceitos, princípios e a trajetória legal da política de Educação Permanente, com exemplos do cotidiano do trabalho, destacando-se as diferenças com relação à educação continuada e educação em saúde. Os especialistas no tema avaliaram positivamente o infográfico por possuir informações claras, que atendem as necessidades do público-alvo; favorecer o aprendizado e estar apto para circular no meio científico. Conclusão: o infográfico contempla conteúdos sobre a Educação Permanente em Saúde ao representar o cenário do cotidiano do trabalho e incentiva a reflexão pelos trabalhadores da saúde.

Objective: to create an animated infographic on the concept of Permanent Health Education according to the National Policy and its main differences compared to continuing education and health education. Method: a methodological study that analyzed context and knowledge gaps with a literature review and brainstorming; synthesized knowledge into a concept map; built and validated a script; created a didactic design; and produced infographic media. 18 representatives from the Center for Permanent Education and Humanization participated in the stages of context analysis and synthesis of knowledge, and six specialists participated in the validation of the script. Results: through the combination of texts, images, audios, animations and transitions, the concepts, principles and legal journey of the Permanent Education policy were presented with examples from daily work and, at the end, the difference compared to continuing education and health education is presented. The specialist on the theme evaluated the infographic positively as it has clear information that meet the needs of the target audience; favors learning; and is able to circulate in the scientific environment. Conclusion: the infographic includes content on Permanent Health Education as it represents the daily work scenario and encourages reflection by the health care workers.

Objetivo: desarrollar una infografía animada sobre el concepto de Educación Permanente en Salud de acuerdo con la Política Nacional y sus principales diferencias con respecto a la educación continua y a la educación en salud. Método: estudio metodológico que analizó el contexto y las brechas de conocimiento con revisión de la literatura y brainstorming, sintetizó el conocimiento en un mapa conceptual; creó y validó el guión; elaboró el diseño didáctico y produjo los medios infográficos. Participaron 18 interlocutores del Núcleo de Educación Permanente y Humanización en las etapas de análisis del contexto y síntesis de conocimientos y seis especialistas en la validación del guión. Resultados: mediante la asociación de textos, imágenes, audios, animaciones y transiciones, se presentaron los conceptos, los principios y trayectoria la jurídica de la política de Educación Permanente con ejemplos del trabajo cotidiano y, al final, se expone su diferencia en relación con la educación continua y la educación en salud. Los especialistas en la materia evaluaron positivamente la infografía por contener una información clara que satisface las necesidades del público objetivo: favoreciendo el aprendizaje y ser apta circular en el medio científico. Conclusión: la infografía contempla contenidos sobre la Educación Permanente en Salud al representar el escenario del trabajo diario; además, incentiva la reflexión de los trabajadores de la salud.

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To investigate the access to medicines by Brazilian families by monetary and non-monetary acquisition data. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study based on data obtained from the 2008/2009 Brazilian Household Budget Survey. The units of assessment were households that participated in the survey and the data on the acquisition of medicines over the 30 days prior to the interviews. The medicines were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. RESULTS Acquisition of medicines was reported by 82.9% of Brazilian households, with 2.38 medicines/household, and 0.72 medicine/individual. In the South and Southeast regions, the average acquisition was slightly greater than the national average (2.53 and 2.49, respectively). In 22.3% of Brazilian households, it was reported that a medicine was not acquired due to lack of financial resources, mainly in the North and Northeastern regions, and in rural areas. Approximately 15.0% of medicines were obtained with no costs, 90.1% of them by the Brazilian Unified Health System. The medicines most acquired were those acting on the nervous system (28.8% of Brazilian households), on the cardiovascular system (15.7%), on the digestive tract and metabolism (14.3%), and on the respiratory system (12.1%). Overall, the quantity of medicines acquired was greater in higher socioeconomic classes of the population, with the exception of antiparasitic products, most likely because of the precarious sanitary conditions faced by less privileged social classes. CONCLUSIONS The acquisition of medicines is a common practice in Brazil, being reported by over 80.0% of the Brazilian households in 2008/2009. Although the data obtained from the Brazilian Household Budget Survey have some limitations, the information obtained in this study can help health authorities to design national and regional policies to guarantee access to these products while promoting their rational use.

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To investigate the access to medicines by Brazilian families by monetary and non-monetary acquisition data. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study based on data obtained from the 2008/2009 Brazilian Household Budget Survey. The units of assessment were households that participated in the survey and the data on the acquisition of medicines over the 30 days prior to the interviews. The medicines were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. RESULTS Acquisition of medicines was reported by 82.9% of Brazilian households, with 2.38 medicines/household, and 0.72 medicine/individual. In the South and Southeast regions, the average acquisition was slightly greater than the national average (2.53 and 2.49, respectively). In 22.3% of Brazilian households, it was reported that a medicine was not acquired due to lack of financial resources, mainly in the North and Northeastern regions, and in rural areas. Approximately 15.0% of medicines were obtained with no costs, 90.1% of them by the Brazilian Unified Health System. The medicines most acquired were those acting on the nervous system (28.8% of Brazilian households), on the cardiovascular system (15.7%), on the digestive tract and metabolism (14.3%), and on the respiratory system (12.1%). Overall, the quantity of medicines acquired was greater in higher socioeconomic classes of the population, with the exception of antiparasitic products, most likely because of the precarious sanitary conditions faced by less privileged social classes. CONCLUSIONS The acquisition of medicines is a common practice in Brazil, being reported by over 80.0% of the Brazilian households in 2008/2009. Although the data obtained from the Brazilian Household Budget Survey have some limitations, the information obtained in this study can help health authorities to design national and regional policies to guarantee access to these products while promoting their rational use.

OBJETIVO:estimar as chances de adoecimento por coqueluche segundo número de doses de vacinas Pertussisadministradas e idade, no Brasil.MÉTODOS:estudo de caso-controle utilizando dados do Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Sinan) no período 2007-2011; considerou-se como casos aqueles notificados com coqueluche confirmada, e como controles, aqueles descartados; foram calculadas as odds ratio(OR) e respectivos intervalos de confiança de 95% (IC95%).RESULTADOS:foram incluídos 5.389 casos e 10.689 controles; entre 7-12 meses de idade, a chance de adoecimento foi maior com 1 dose administrada [OR:2,1(IC95%:1,3-3,4)], comparativamente às 3 doses esperadas; entre 1-3 anos, essa chance foi maior sem reforço vacinal [OR 1 dose: 2,4 (IC95%:1,6-3,8); OR 2 doses:3,6 (IC95%:2,2-6,1); OR 3 doses:1,6 (IC:1,3-2,2); OR 0 dose:2,8 (IC95%:1,7-4,8)], quando este era esperado; entre 7-15 anos, foi maior com 1 reforço [OR:1,6 (IC95%:1,2-2,3)], quando 2 eram esperados.CONCLUSÃO:o esquema vacinal incompleto aumenta as chances de adoecimento por coqueluche em todas as idades estudadas.

OBJECTIVE:estimate the likelihood of pertussis according to number of vaccine doses received and age.METHODS:Case-control study using 2007-2011 SINAN data. "Cases" were considered to be confirmed reported pertussis cases. "Controls" were the discarded cases.RESULTS:5,389 cases and 10,689 controls were included. In those aged 7-12 months, cases were twice as likely [OR:2.1 (95%CI:1.3-3.4)] when only 1 instead of 3 doses had been administered. In 1-3 year-olds, likelihood was greater in those not having boosters (1 booster expected) [OR 1 dose: 2.4 (95%CI:1.6-3.8); OR 2 doses: 3.6 (95%CI:2.2-6.1); OR 3 doses: 1.6 (95%CI:1.3-2.2); OR 0 dose: 2.8 (95%CI:1.7-4.8)]. In 7-15 year-olds, cases were 60% more likely in those having had 1 booster instead of 2 [OR:1.6 (95%CI:1.2-2.3)].CONCLUSION:incomplete immunization increases likelihood of contracting pertussis in all age groups studied, mainly 7-15 years.

OBJETIVO: estimar as chances de adoecimento por coqueluche segundo número de doses de vacinas Pertussis administradas e idade, no Brasil. MÉTODOS: estudo de caso-controle utilizando dados do Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Sinan) no período 2007-2011; considerou-se como casos aqueles notificados com coqueluche confirmada, e como controles, aqueles descartados; foram calculadas as odds ratio (OR) e respectivos intervalos de confiança de 95% (IC95%). RESULTADOS: foram incluídos 5.389 casos e 10.689 controles; entre 7-12 meses de idade, a chance de adoecimento foi maior com 1 dose administrada [OR:2,1(IC95%:1,3-3,4)], comparativamente às 3 doses esperadas; entre 1-3 anos, essa chance foi maior sem reforço vacinal [OR 1 dose: 2,4 (IC95%:1,6-3,8); OR 2 doses:3,6 (IC95%:2,2-6,1); OR 3 doses:1,6 (IC:1,3-2,2); OR 0 dose:2,8 (IC95%:1,7-4,8)], quando este era esperado; entre 7-15 anos, foi maior com 1 reforço [OR:1,6 (IC95%:1,2-2,3)], quando 2 eram esperados. CONCLUSÃO: o esquema vacinal incompleto aumenta as chances de adoecimento por coqueluche em todas as idades estudadas.

OBJECTIVE: estimate the likelihood of pertussis according to number of vaccine doses received and age. METHODS: Case-control study using 2007-2011 SINAN data. "Cases" were considered to be confirmed reported pertussis cases. "Controls" were the discarded cases. RESULTS: 5,389 cases and 10,689 controls were included. In those aged 7-12 months, cases were twice as likely [OR:2.1 (95%CI:1.3-3.4)] when only 1 instead of 3 doses had been administered. In 1-3 year-olds, likelihood was greater in those not having boosters (1 booster expected) [OR 1 dose: 2.4 (95%CI:1.6-3.8); OR 2 doses: 3.6 (95%CI:2.2-6.1); OR 3 doses: 1.6 (95%CI:1.3-2.2); OR 0 dose: 2.8 (95%CI:1.7-4.8)]. In 7-15 year-olds, cases were 60% more likely in those having had 1 booster instead of 2 [OR:1.6 (95%CI:1.2-2.3)]. CONCLUSION: incomplete immunization increases likelihood of contracting pertussis in all age groups studied, mainly 7-15 years.